Last week I analysed data accidentally released by the UKHSA that appeared to show that two doses of vaccine rapidly fail to offer any protection whatsoever, in opposition to official statistics that continue to show that the vaccines, while offering no protection against infection, still offer protection against illness and death.
This looks to me like a direct reaction to the recently leaked legal advice to UK Government to the effect that the vaccine mandates are very vulnerable to judicial review. The mandates require double vaccination; UKSHA data showing sky high case rates in doubly vaccinated would be absolutely disastrous for judicial review purposes. So presentation of this data has to be stopped.
If this analysis is right, it amounts to major breach of civil service code & legal requirements- civil servants are not permitted to conceal data to serve political ends. I’d suggest useful step would be FOIs to UKSHA seeking all correspondence (including Teams discussions) & meeting minutes relating to decision to change approach- in particular who signed off on it, what consideration given to accessibility & any discussion of effect of change in context of of NHS mandates - and of course the figures for the doubly vaccinated. The civil service code is there for a reason. This sort of flagrant violation & politicisation of data presentation is immoral and dangerous.
I've also emailed the (UK) EHRC noting that as the figures show clearly that jabbing makes no difference to a person being infectious, any discrimination against the unjabbed is just that - discrimination, pure and simple...
To whom it may concern:
Given that we now know that the four new format experimental gene therapy treatments for Covid neither protect you from getting Covid or from then infecting others, any action against the unvaccinated is clear and obvious discrimination.
I urge you to take action against all public sector agencies threatening to implement vaccine mandates, and also against any such actions in the private sector.
Many thanks
(Jeremy Poynton)
Triple-Jabbed Over-30s Have Higher Infection Rates Than the Unvaccinated, UKHSA Data Show
"I note that the UK government only yesterday stated that they were removing the requirement for vaccine passports imminently — perhaps they got advance notice of these data from the UKHSA."
Not for health and care workers though. Despite many working all through the fake pandemic with no jabs.
ONS have released the DEAD BY COVID figures (as opposed to the "with" Covid fraud.
Feb 2020 to De4c 2021. Average deaths. 10 - TEN - a day.
Looking at the all-cause mortality data from England and Wales, there is a slow, gradual rise in deaths around July, 2021 that could possibly be from vaccine failure.
There are some examples of negative vaccine effectiveness in Public Health England's reports on influenza vaccine effectiveness:
This looks to me like a direct reaction to the recently leaked legal advice to UK Government to the effect that the vaccine mandates are very vulnerable to judicial review. The mandates require double vaccination; UKSHA data showing sky high case rates in doubly vaccinated would be absolutely disastrous for judicial review purposes. So presentation of this data has to be stopped.
If this analysis is right, it amounts to major breach of civil service code & legal requirements- civil servants are not permitted to conceal data to serve political ends. I’d suggest useful step would be FOIs to UKSHA seeking all correspondence (including Teams discussions) & meeting minutes relating to decision to change approach- in particular who signed off on it, what consideration given to accessibility & any discussion of effect of change in context of of NHS mandates - and of course the figures for the doubly vaccinated. The civil service code is there for a reason. This sort of flagrant violation & politicisation of data presentation is immoral and dangerous.
I've also emailed the (UK) EHRC noting that as the figures show clearly that jabbing makes no difference to a person being infectious, any discrimination against the unjabbed is just that - discrimination, pure and simple...
To whom it may concern:
Given that we now know that the four new format experimental gene therapy treatments for Covid neither protect you from getting Covid or from then infecting others, any action against the unvaccinated is clear and obvious discrimination.
I urge you to take action against all public sector agencies threatening to implement vaccine mandates, and also against any such actions in the private sector.
Many thanks
(Jeremy Poynton)
Triple-Jabbed Over-30s Have Higher Infection Rates Than the Unvaccinated, UKHSA Data Show
Do you think this is why the narrative is collapsing quickly or is there another reason?
On a separate note:
Only 6,183 people died solely of COVID-19 in England & Wales
And only 833 under 60s.
https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/only-6183-people-died-solely-of-covid
"I note that the UK government only yesterday stated that they were removing the requirement for vaccine passports imminently — perhaps they got advance notice of these data from the UKHSA."
Not for health and care workers though. Despite many working all through the fake pandemic with no jabs.
ONS have released the DEAD BY COVID figures (as opposed to the "with" Covid fraud.
Feb 2020 to De4c 2021. Average deaths. 10 - TEN - a day.
Repeat TEN DEATHS A DAY FROM COVID
https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/covid19deathsandautopsiesfeb2020todec2021
Looking at the all-cause mortality data from England and Wales, there is a slow, gradual rise in deaths around July, 2021 that could possibly be from vaccine failure.
There are some examples of negative vaccine effectiveness in Public Health England's reports on influenza vaccine effectiveness:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/influenza-vaccine-effectiveness-seasonal-estimates
The current mRNA experiment was NEVER designed to "protect against death"... Only really distracted MMS/3i's thought that was/is the case.
Comparing equal time periods... official Portugal data,
https://i.postimg.cc/DZfSY6Zs/Portroikal-sucesso-vacinas-en.png
Don't need for very fancy math and scripts!
just proves that everyone needs q 2 month boosters