Thank you so much for writing this series - everything you've done in this regard has been greatly appreciated. It takes enormous patience to dissect this data, and I am personally grateful to you and others on Substack who take the time to crunch the numbers and discuss the implications. I come from a background in astrophysics and AI, so statistics was always 'the other world' to me - how glad I am that this other world exists and that there are good people like you living in it. 💙
It's good to have something to show the remaining majority of head-in-the-sand doubters who don't want to realise they've been swindled and abused by those who should have known better.
It also helps that the tenor of your articles is calm and considered. Some of the foamier-at-the-mouth critics of covid-era governmental behaviour aren't much help, since they prefer saliva-emission to reason.
Does this read correctly? Or should the word 'unvaccinated' be removed and replaced by 'vaccinated'?
"....They were correct to point out some potential reasons for the very high incidence of Covid in the unvaccinated population – but they left one potential reason out: That they’d used a poorly tested vaccine that might have resulted in an increase in the risk of infection, aka negative vaccine effectiveness..."
The lack of due diligence on the part of these idiots is startling. Thanks.
Thank you so much for writing this series - everything you've done in this regard has been greatly appreciated. It takes enormous patience to dissect this data, and I am personally grateful to you and others on Substack who take the time to crunch the numbers and discuss the implications. I come from a background in astrophysics and AI, so statistics was always 'the other world' to me - how glad I am that this other world exists and that there are good people like you living in it. 💙
I'd add my thanks to the others below.
It's good to have something to show the remaining majority of head-in-the-sand doubters who don't want to realise they've been swindled and abused by those who should have known better.
It also helps that the tenor of your articles is calm and considered. Some of the foamier-at-the-mouth critics of covid-era governmental behaviour aren't much help, since they prefer saliva-emission to reason.
Most appreciated, and always a good read.
Does this read correctly? Or should the word 'unvaccinated' be removed and replaced by 'vaccinated'?
"....They were correct to point out some potential reasons for the very high incidence of Covid in the unvaccinated population – but they left one potential reason out: That they’d used a poorly tested vaccine that might have resulted in an increase in the risk of infection, aka negative vaccine effectiveness..."
Nice write up. Did you catch T Coddington's charting of the time series showing the shifting trend? https://inumero.substack.com/p/more-evidence-for-vaccine-accelerating
I was also fascinated by that trend in the Vaccine Surveillance Reports, and that fact that even if the data wasn't great, it was still revealing the trend. I wrote about it here: https://lostintranslations.substack.com/p/excess-deaths-the-slow-burn