In the last few days researchers from the Vaccine Research Center at the US NIH released a paper for peer review on the performance of a new mRNA vaccine targeting Omicron variant, delivered as a ‘booster’ after two doses of mRNA vaccine targeting the original Wuhan strain (ie, the current type of covid vaccine).
Everything related to "science" in the success that is OPERATION COVIDIUS is a flaw.
A simple observation of reality for the cattle farm Portugal (where the "experts" say "after one year we can say that the vaccines are a success!"):
Today, Feb 10th, we have 91,22% of the cattle inoculated with 2 doses, and 55,09% with 3 doses.
If we consider in this scenario that death occurs on the severely ill (no reason to consider that death occurs on a mild case or even on the asymptomatic) the real life evidence (this naturally excludes the pharma studies made in-house) shows that these inoculations aren't "highly effective at reducing severe illness" [and death]!
Official data for the cattle farm Portugal:
From 17Mar2020 to 26Dec2020 (285 days) WITHOUT "vaccine": average daily deaths with PCR tag "COVID-19" - 23
From 27Dec2020 to 07Oct2021 (also 285 days) WITH "vaccine": average daily deaths with PCR tag "COVID-19" - 40
So for the same period of time we can see that the introduction of the "vaccine" caused more deaths, which means caused more severe illness.
And if we continue to follow the count not even more days can do the trick!
From 27Dec2020 to 04Feb2022 (405 days!) WITH "vaccine": average daily deaths with PCR tag "COVID-19" - 34
So unless the "vaccine success" is being viewed from the "culling the cattle" perspective, it clearly does't look that the above statement is adequate.
But DO KEEP taking experimental mRNA spew just to be able to travel by plane and go to restaurants and so on! Really smart!
"The CDC says that the “COVID-19 vaccines do not change or interact with your DNA in any way,” claiming that all of the ingredients in both mRNA and viral vector COVID-19 vaccines (administered in the United States) are discarded from the body once antibodies are produced."
“Our COVID-19 vaccine does not alter the DNA sequence of a human cell,” a Pfizer spokesperson told
Well, read this FUNNY study:
Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line
Received: 18 January 2022 / Revised: 19 February 2022 / Accepted: 23 February 2022 / Published: 25 February 2022
Our results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution. We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure.
I appreciate the author's hypothesis that the disease caused by the novel coronavirus was, in fact, spreading widely around the world months before the alleged "birth" of the pandemic (in Wuhan in late December 2019). It might be too late, but I've long thought it would be fascinating and important to conduct a study of people who believe they had COVID before March 2020. Such a study would focus on individuals who had an illness that included most of the Covid symptoms, who went to a doctor because of this, and who tested "negative" for influenza. How many of this group (which is actually massive in number) later tested positive for COVID with a PCR test? If this positive rate is significantly lower than the population at large, this finding would suggest that these individuals likely DID have COVID when they think they did and likely developed natural immunity. For what it's worth, I would be in this hypothetical study group as I am convinced I had COVID in January 2020 (and I have never tested positive for COVID since). It is telling (to me) that such a study has never been conducted or proposed. The reason for this, in my opinion, is that researchers probably know what such a study would find: Many of these people DID have COVID before mid-March 2020.
Evidence / biology supporting your last paragraph?
Certainly not in this paper. Both boosted groups did fine in viral challenge vs unvaxxed controls. The Omicron booster was not “ less and less effective.” It was literally as / more effective - though in reality it’s nonsensical to make any conclusions about the impact of the boosters with only 8 subjects and no vaxxed and not boosted controls. Two of the subjects had overperforming neutralizing results before boost. Which booster did they get? This is remedial study interpretation fail.
Wow, good spot. I thought the same when I read a report about the article but didn't actually see the wording in the report itself!
https://nakedemperor.substack.com/
Off topic slightly but this paper deals with the proven effects on the immune system of the mrna jabs. OAS
Please send to all and sundry - especially "experts" of mrna jabs are good, persuasion.
https://www.authorea.com/users/455597/articles/552937-innate-immune-suppression-by-sars-cov-2-mrna-vaccinations-the-role-of-g-quadruplexes-exosomes-and-micrornas
You will see that OAS is only one of the delights in store....
I also am a strong believer that OAS is very involved and will likely lead to endless Covids in the vaxxed. Great find
Everything related to "science" in the success that is OPERATION COVIDIUS is a flaw.
A simple observation of reality for the cattle farm Portugal (where the "experts" say "after one year we can say that the vaccines are a success!"):
Today, Feb 10th, we have 91,22% of the cattle inoculated with 2 doses, and 55,09% with 3 doses.
If we consider in this scenario that death occurs on the severely ill (no reason to consider that death occurs on a mild case or even on the asymptomatic) the real life evidence (this naturally excludes the pharma studies made in-house) shows that these inoculations aren't "highly effective at reducing severe illness" [and death]!
Official data for the cattle farm Portugal:
From 17Mar2020 to 26Dec2020 (285 days) WITHOUT "vaccine": average daily deaths with PCR tag "COVID-19" - 23
From 27Dec2020 to 07Oct2021 (also 285 days) WITH "vaccine": average daily deaths with PCR tag "COVID-19" - 40
So for the same period of time we can see that the introduction of the "vaccine" caused more deaths, which means caused more severe illness.
And if we continue to follow the count not even more days can do the trick!
From 27Dec2020 to 04Feb2022 (405 days!) WITH "vaccine": average daily deaths with PCR tag "COVID-19" - 34
So unless the "vaccine success" is being viewed from the "culling the cattle" perspective, it clearly does't look that the above statement is adequate.
But DO KEEP taking experimental mRNA spew just to be able to travel by plane and go to restaurants and so on! Really smart!
"The CDC says that the “COVID-19 vaccines do not change or interact with your DNA in any way,” claiming that all of the ingredients in both mRNA and viral vector COVID-19 vaccines (administered in the United States) are discarded from the body once antibodies are produced."
“Our COVID-19 vaccine does not alter the DNA sequence of a human cell,” a Pfizer spokesperson told
Well, read this FUNNY study:
Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line
Received: 18 January 2022 / Revised: 19 February 2022 / Accepted: 23 February 2022 / Published: 25 February 2022
Our results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution. We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure.
https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm
DO NOT FORGET TO GET YOUR MIRACLE mRNA SPEW BOOSTER! And good luck...
I appreciate the author's hypothesis that the disease caused by the novel coronavirus was, in fact, spreading widely around the world months before the alleged "birth" of the pandemic (in Wuhan in late December 2019). It might be too late, but I've long thought it would be fascinating and important to conduct a study of people who believe they had COVID before March 2020. Such a study would focus on individuals who had an illness that included most of the Covid symptoms, who went to a doctor because of this, and who tested "negative" for influenza. How many of this group (which is actually massive in number) later tested positive for COVID with a PCR test? If this positive rate is significantly lower than the population at large, this finding would suggest that these individuals likely DID have COVID when they think they did and likely developed natural immunity. For what it's worth, I would be in this hypothetical study group as I am convinced I had COVID in January 2020 (and I have never tested positive for COVID since). It is telling (to me) that such a study has never been conducted or proposed. The reason for this, in my opinion, is that researchers probably know what such a study would find: Many of these people DID have COVID before mid-March 2020.
Great post, thank you. 💜
Evidence / biology supporting your last paragraph?
Certainly not in this paper. Both boosted groups did fine in viral challenge vs unvaxxed controls. The Omicron booster was not “ less and less effective.” It was literally as / more effective - though in reality it’s nonsensical to make any conclusions about the impact of the boosters with only 8 subjects and no vaxxed and not boosted controls. Two of the subjects had overperforming neutralizing results before boost. Which booster did they get? This is remedial study interpretation fail.