Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Davison's avatar

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X

An analysis of the mRNA jabs on a bio-molecular/immunological level

No wonder why they want to eliminate proper control groups aka the unjabbed.

What is happening, suppression of debate, removal of dissent, cancelling evidence based medicine etc. is beyond evil.

Expand full comment
Sandra Barwick's avatar

The efficacy of natural immunity re informed consent is a very good point. In fact they were pushing the opposite via the media, that natural immunity was not effective, when they had no such evidence. That was a very early signal of bad - one could say criminal - intent.

At the start, given the very limited sample in the Pfizer trial, which I think had very few old people, an upper limit of age from memory in the 80s, and no one with auto immune disease, I thought naively that the authorities would begin by injecting those groups well represented in the trial, and proceed with caution to the others. But no. Injecting Prince Philip, very old and sick, straight away seemed a great risk to me, and I would still like to know whether the Queen had been given a so called booster shortly before she died. so suddenly. I have a friend who was given a Pfizer first injection early in 2021 as a healthworker. It was described to her as the Waitrose of vaccines. She has Hashimotos, and asked in the jab centre whether it had been tested on people with that condition: the response was that it had been so widely tested it must have been.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts