What still makes me scratch my head in wonder is the reality that a simple, yet very successful, propaganda operation was able to make ~8 billion uman animals so fearful of developing Pneumonia... I can only assume that these billions uman animals have absolutely no personal responsibility and are indeed incapable of taking proper care of their own Organism. So no wonder they subject themselves to this new medical fascism.
About the miracle mRNA and friends they are working very well. Profits are huge, new billionaires were created... what else is to be expected?
How is it mechanistically possible that the jab has negative efficacy for transmission yet somehow appears to do something with respect to hospitalization and death?
"1 The early observations for 2 doses of AstraZeneca are particularly likely to be unreliable as they are based on relative small numbers and are likely to reflect an older population and a population with more co-morbidities than those given the Pfizer vaccine, and this may explain the negative point estimates".
They make a point about using these results : "These results should be interpreted with caution due to the low numbers and the possible biases related to the populations with highest exposure to Omicron (including travellers and their close contacts) which cannot fully be accounted for".
So I would wait for 'better' data, before coming to a 'conclusion'.
What still makes me scratch my head in wonder is the reality that a simple, yet very successful, propaganda operation was able to make ~8 billion uman animals so fearful of developing Pneumonia... I can only assume that these billions uman animals have absolutely no personal responsibility and are indeed incapable of taking proper care of their own Organism. So no wonder they subject themselves to this new medical fascism.
About the miracle mRNA and friends they are working very well. Profits are huge, new billionaires were created... what else is to be expected?
How is it mechanistically possible that the jab has negative efficacy for transmission yet somehow appears to do something with respect to hospitalization and death?
Don't forget the note added to the graphs:
"1 The early observations for 2 doses of AstraZeneca are particularly likely to be unreliable as they are based on relative small numbers and are likely to reflect an older population and a population with more co-morbidities than those given the Pfizer vaccine, and this may explain the negative point estimates".
They make a point about using these results : "These results should be interpreted with caution due to the low numbers and the possible biases related to the populations with highest exposure to Omicron (including travellers and their close contacts) which cannot fully be accounted for".
So I would wait for 'better' data, before coming to a 'conclusion'.
Small point- your first reference to ‘the graph on the right’ should I think be ‘on the left’.
The Moronic variant and Jabs... From the CDC:
"Characteristics of the First Investigated U.S. COVID-19 Cases Attributed to the Omicron Variant
Details are available for 43 cases of COVID-19 attributed to the Omicron variant; 25 (58%) were in persons aged 18–39 years (Table)."
In the table we can read the following No.(%):
COVID-19 vaccination status†
Unvaccinated 8 (19)
Partially vaccinated 0 (—)
Vaccinated 20 (47)
Vaccinated plus an additional dose§ 14 (33)
Unknown 1 (2)
"they can enter crowded buildings without needing a negative test"
Once again... PCR IS NOT A TEST!
And the fun reality is that a "negative" PCR kit is just as useful as the current jabs.