Summary: Yet another study shows that two doses of vaccine have negative efficiency against Omicron variant — ie, they’ve resulted in far higher case numbers than if we’d never vaccinated at all.
We have arrived at a place of extreme cognitive dissonance (aka Covidian dogma) where the vaccines don’t work against Omnicron and the only solution is more vaccines.
I just like to mention that there are examples of negative vaccine effectiveness with other viruses, for example Public Health England's reports on influenza vaccine effectiveness:
Hi Bartram, am I right in saying you are amanuensis from Daily Sceptic? If so, I would like to ask you a couple of questions on the article they posted today. Thanks in advance for your time.
Also, I note from the Imperial paper that Table 3 presents the same data, only using UKHSA’s protection calculations. Yes, you guessed it. No negative protection for those dosed with Pfizer
I note that UKHSA is using a test-negative case-control methodology -- I fear that there is viral interference with the vaccines, that is, they're making it more likely for the vaccinated to get other infections. This makes TNCC an inappropriate method that'll lead to an overestimate of effectiveness.
Someone else has alluded to this but we seem to have numerous words describing the performance of vaccines..efficiency in this article, along with efficacy and effectiveness. Can someone provide the definitive distinctions between them? Also I find the improvement in lowering case numbers for the 'boostered' to be suspicious in light of the overall waning efficacy (?) of the alpha based vax. Any alternative theories as to what is happening here?
I think there's a complex interplay between impaired innate immunity and short-lived IgA antibodies.
If this is true what we should see in the early days of the boosters is lower case numbers for covid but higher case numbers for everything else.
I note that there appears to be a significant rise in influenza in recent weeks... If anyone is interested, in the UK this appears to be swine flu (H1N1), whereas elsewhere in the world it appears to be H3N2.
After about 2 months the IgA antibodies in the boosted should wane significantly -- thus we might see a rise in covid case numbers in those boosted earliest in the UK around about now.
So..extrapolating into the future, the case for mandatory combined flu and covid vax becomes more compelling..to stop the 'twin threat'? Jeez we are becoming locked in a losers loop.
Thank you for your articles, I really like reading proper analysis. About your last question, it would make sense if it weren't the case that governments are still trying to vaccinate those who have not yet been vaccinated (using tools like mandates, digital certificates, strong propaganda, etc.), including the younger demographics. Thus, there seems to be no acknowledgment of the fact that this is a massive error that might have massive consequences?
I thought about adding this, but it was already making the point.
It appears that the vaccines are making things worse, but they can't admit to this because this would lead to riots.
Thus they have to keep on pushing vaccination in the unvaccinated -- to say at this point that this is counterproductive and that they should remain unvaccinated would be an admission of failure.
Ie, they're not encouraging the boosters because they want to make things better -- they're encouraging the boosters so that people don't realise that they've created a disaster.
The language about 'vaccine effectiveness' isn't helpful.
The field has decided that clinical trials give you information on 'vaccine efficacy', while real-world data gives information on 'vaccine effectiveness'. There are reasons for this nuance but IMO they're overplayed and end up with people not fully understanding what's going on. I use 'efficiency' to try to get around this problem. I agree that efficacy is a better word.
We have arrived at a place of extreme cognitive dissonance (aka Covidian dogma) where the vaccines don’t work against Omnicron and the only solution is more vaccines.
I just like to mention that there are examples of negative vaccine effectiveness with other viruses, for example Public Health England's reports on influenza vaccine effectiveness:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/influenza-vaccine-effectiveness-seasonal-estimates
Your report on negative vaccine efficiency. Are there differences between the courses of the disease between the vaccinated and unvaccinated?
It's evident that the only solution is to start having a jab per month... Safe & Protect!
Hi Bartram, am I right in saying you are amanuensis from Daily Sceptic? If so, I would like to ask you a couple of questions on the article they posted today. Thanks in advance for your time.
Hi -- that's me. I've just popped that article up here -- perhaps ask the questions on that post?
Thank you, I will. Great job btw.
Also, I note from the Imperial paper that Table 3 presents the same data, only using UKHSA’s protection calculations. Yes, you guessed it. No negative protection for those dosed with Pfizer
I note that UKHSA is using a test-negative case-control methodology -- I fear that there is viral interference with the vaccines, that is, they're making it more likely for the vaccinated to get other infections. This makes TNCC an inappropriate method that'll lead to an overestimate of effectiveness.
That means its working.
Someone else has alluded to this but we seem to have numerous words describing the performance of vaccines..efficiency in this article, along with efficacy and effectiveness. Can someone provide the definitive distinctions between them? Also I find the improvement in lowering case numbers for the 'boostered' to be suspicious in light of the overall waning efficacy (?) of the alpha based vax. Any alternative theories as to what is happening here?
Re lowered case numbers.
I think there's a complex interplay between impaired innate immunity and short-lived IgA antibodies.
If this is true what we should see in the early days of the boosters is lower case numbers for covid but higher case numbers for everything else.
I note that there appears to be a significant rise in influenza in recent weeks... If anyone is interested, in the UK this appears to be swine flu (H1N1), whereas elsewhere in the world it appears to be H3N2.
After about 2 months the IgA antibodies in the boosted should wane significantly -- thus we might see a rise in covid case numbers in those boosted earliest in the UK around about now.
So..extrapolating into the future, the case for mandatory combined flu and covid vax becomes more compelling..to stop the 'twin threat'? Jeez we are becoming locked in a losers loop.
According to the specialists
Efficacy = clinical trials
Effectiveness = everything else.
According to normal people -- they're all synonyms of the same thing, how well the vaccines actually do.
This
Thank you for your articles, I really like reading proper analysis. About your last question, it would make sense if it weren't the case that governments are still trying to vaccinate those who have not yet been vaccinated (using tools like mandates, digital certificates, strong propaganda, etc.), including the younger demographics. Thus, there seems to be no acknowledgment of the fact that this is a massive error that might have massive consequences?
I thought about adding this, but it was already making the point.
It appears that the vaccines are making things worse, but they can't admit to this because this would lead to riots.
Thus they have to keep on pushing vaccination in the unvaccinated -- to say at this point that this is counterproductive and that they should remain unvaccinated would be an admission of failure.
Ie, they're not encouraging the boosters because they want to make things better -- they're encouraging the boosters so that people don't realise that they've created a disaster.
The language about 'vaccine effectiveness' isn't helpful.
The field has decided that clinical trials give you information on 'vaccine efficacy', while real-world data gives information on 'vaccine effectiveness'. There are reasons for this nuance but IMO they're overplayed and end up with people not fully understanding what's going on. I use 'efficiency' to try to get around this problem. I agree that efficacy is a better word.