Summary: Yet another study shows that two doses of vaccine have negative efficiency against Omicron variant — ie, they’ve resulted in far higher case numbers than if we’d never vaccinated at all. I also note new data that shows that two doses of vaccine had -146% efficiency against Delta variant. It is very likely that the vaccines are responsible for the very high case numbers we’re seeing around the world (even before Omicron).
We have arrived at a place of extreme cognitive dissonance (aka Covidian dogma) where the vaccines don’t work against Omnicron and the only solution is more vaccines.
I just like to mention that there are examples of negative vaccine effectiveness with other viruses, for example Public Health England's reports on influenza vaccine effectiveness:
Hi Bartram, am I right in saying you are amanuensis from Daily Sceptic? If so, I would like to ask you a couple of questions on the article they posted today. Thanks in advance for your time.
Also, I note from the Imperial paper that Table 3 presents the same data, only using UKHSA’s protection calculations. Yes, you guessed it. No negative protection for those dosed with Pfizer
Someone else has alluded to this but we seem to have numerous words describing the performance of vaccines..efficiency in this article, along with efficacy and effectiveness. Can someone provide the definitive distinctions between them? Also I find the improvement in lowering case numbers for the 'boostered' to be suspicious in light of the overall waning efficacy (?) of the alpha based vax. Any alternative theories as to what is happening here?
Thank you for your articles, I really like reading proper analysis. About your last question, it would make sense if it weren't the case that governments are still trying to vaccinate those who have not yet been vaccinated (using tools like mandates, digital certificates, strong propaganda, etc.), including the younger demographics. Thus, there seems to be no acknowledgment of the fact that this is a massive error that might have massive consequences?
Even more negative vaccine efficiency
We have arrived at a place of extreme cognitive dissonance (aka Covidian dogma) where the vaccines don’t work against Omnicron and the only solution is more vaccines.
I just like to mention that there are examples of negative vaccine effectiveness with other viruses, for example Public Health England's reports on influenza vaccine effectiveness:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/influenza-vaccine-effectiveness-seasonal-estimates
Your report on negative vaccine efficiency. Are there differences between the courses of the disease between the vaccinated and unvaccinated?
It's evident that the only solution is to start having a jab per month... Safe & Protect!
Hi Bartram, am I right in saying you are amanuensis from Daily Sceptic? If so, I would like to ask you a couple of questions on the article they posted today. Thanks in advance for your time.
Also, I note from the Imperial paper that Table 3 presents the same data, only using UKHSA’s protection calculations. Yes, you guessed it. No negative protection for those dosed with Pfizer
That means its working.
Someone else has alluded to this but we seem to have numerous words describing the performance of vaccines..efficiency in this article, along with efficacy and effectiveness. Can someone provide the definitive distinctions between them? Also I find the improvement in lowering case numbers for the 'boostered' to be suspicious in light of the overall waning efficacy (?) of the alpha based vax. Any alternative theories as to what is happening here?
Thank you for your articles, I really like reading proper analysis. About your last question, it would make sense if it weren't the case that governments are still trying to vaccinate those who have not yet been vaccinated (using tools like mandates, digital certificates, strong propaganda, etc.), including the younger demographics. Thus, there seems to be no acknowledgment of the fact that this is a massive error that might have massive consequences?